After normal saline |
After acetic acid |
After acetic acid |
After Lugol’s iodine |
General assessment | |||||||||||||||||
Normal colposcopic findings | |||||||||||||||||
Abnormal colposcopic findings | |||||||||||||||||
General principles | |||||||||||||||||
Position and size | |||||||||||||||||
Grade 1 (minor) |
| Grade 2 (major) |
| Non-specific |
| Suspicious for invasion |
| Miscellaneous finding |
| |
Nil or transparent | Thin, milky | Distinct, stearin | |
Nil or diffuse | Sharp but irregular, jagged, satellites | Sharp and even, difference in level | |
Fine, regular | Absent | Coarse or atypical vessels | |
< 5 mm | 5-15 mm or 2 quadrants | >15 mm, 3-4 quadrants, or endocervically undefined | |
Brown | Faintly or patchy yellow | Distinctly yellow |
Provisional diagnosis: | Type 1 transformation zone; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) with SPI. |
Management: | Punch biopsy should be directed from the lesion at the 8 o’clock position, because that is most dense and is adjacent to the erosion. |
Histopathology: | LSIL-CIN1. |
Comment: | The low-grade lesion probably extended over the area of erosion. It is also possible that the eroded area had a higher-grade lesion. Careful follow-up is necessary for this woman by repeat colposcopy after 1 year. |