Case |
Speculum examination |
After acetic acid |
After acetic acid |
After acetic acid |
After Lugol’s iodine |
General assessment | |||||||||||||||||
Normal colposcopic findings | |||||||||||||||||
Abnormal colposcopic findings | |||||||||||||||||
General principles | |||||||||||||||||
Position and size | |||||||||||||||||
Grade 1 (minor) |
| Grade 2 (major) |
| Non-specific |
| Suspicious for invasion |
| Miscellaneous finding |
| |
Nil or transparent | Thin, milky | Distinct, stearin | |
Nil or diffuse | Sharp but irregular, jagged, satellites | Sharp and even, difference in level | |
Fine, regular | Absent | Coarse or atypical vessels | |
< 5 mm | 5-15 mm or 2 quadrants | >15 mm, 3-4 quadrants, or endocervically undefined | |
Brown | Faintly or patchy yellow | Distinctly yellow |
Provisional diagnosis: | Type 2 transformation zone; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). |
Management: | LLETZ (type 2 excision). |
Histopathology: | HSIL-CIN3. |
Comment: | Erosion is responsible for a false squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) in this case. The SCJ appears to be on the ectocervix in the posterior lip. In reality, it is situated just proximal to the external os in the canal. |